Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saranya Mohan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (default to keep). WP:CSB applies as well - she does appear to have acted in notable films - there's a lot of coverage out there. Black Kite 20:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saranya Mohan

Reads like an advert. In addition, may not be notable: Only two movies, both of which were Tamil-language films that did not reach a huge audience. Opinions? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 01:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The problems with this article are that it's slightly non-neutral in tone, and unsourced. I've toned down most of the more effusive praise. As for sourcing, there's a great many Google hits, many of which appear to be reliable secondary sources. I'm not too familiar with India or entertainment-related issues so I can't judge which ones are sound sources but I'm 99% confident some of them are. Reyk _YO! 13:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question I cant judge this topic, but since when are "huge" audiences necessary for notability? DGG (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 22:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources in this article leads me to conclude that the article is not in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's harder to find sources for subjects from countries that aren't quite so wired. However, a google news search[1] gets several hits, some of which look usable. So, no clear indication that she meets WP:BIO, but, given the inherent challenges, I see this as sufficient evidence that she's a notable Tamal actress.--Kubigula (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.