Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Shrawan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Shrawan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how she manages to pass our notability guideline or our subject specific guidelines.Nothing resembling non-trivial or non-gossip coverage in RS can be located.Mere mentions in cast-lists of a few films, which hardly made any buzz. ∯WBG^converse 13:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One citation is a wedding announcement with a selection of photos. The others are press releases promoting What About Savarkar?, a film on which we have no article (IMDb link). A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing better. Fails WP:NACTOR. Narky Blert (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Marathi is one of several languages of the Subcontinent where the sourcing is terrible – and that is the problem. We need WP:RS sources. I will accept sources in any language or script, even if they're difficult to translate (Meadow Mari or Odia, anyone?), but without RS sources you cannot get through WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 04:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.