Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Overlack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Overlack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:NPOL Heideneii (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – this is by and large the classic scenario of nearly all relevant coverage being mainly about the org itself rather than the person, and WP:PASSING applies. Similarly to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Loeper, I'd normally be inclined to !vote redirect, but the former at least co-chairs his party, while Overlack co-founded a regional branch of the Klimaliste political association in Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg along with 24 others. Add to that her withdrawal from politics in January (per her LinkedIn, she's now an "HR & Operations Manager"), and I think outright deletion makes the most sense. AngryHarpy‍^talk 11:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for putting salt in the wound :D

As for the other article you mentioned, I disagree and look at TAZ, Le Figaro and Volkskrant in addition to various local articles, but I'm with you on this one, as even the local coverage is primarily about the party. --Heideneii (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC) Striking; I removed from the delsort due to not being conservatism. Sennecaster (Chat) 13:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sennecaster (Chat) 13:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Low profile individual, lack of sources, and I was unable to identify a rational merge or redirect target.—S Marshall T/C 15:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.