Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saigol DDC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 02:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saigol DDC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking this to AFD as PROD is contested. In my opinion, this article failed WP:CORPDEPTH. All of the references are pointing out to the notability of houses that they are selling, but there are no in-depth coverage of the company itself. The houses that they are selling or the people that bought using their services might be notable, but in my opinion their notability should not be inherited to the company per WP:INHERITED. In the articles, their company are only mentioned in passing, and none of them are in-depth coverage. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and United Kingdom. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unsourced (with respect to coverage of the company, not just houses it might have worked on) and does not meet any notability criteria. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.