Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russel Earl Winstead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Per 1E. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Russel Earl Winstead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP1E, for murdering his aunt. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Possibly keep – This person isn't notable otherwise for the heinous crime he was convicted for, but it appears to have received significant press. Also, the title of the article appears to possibly be spelled incorrectly. Try this news search instead:
- Delete: All coverage is about him murdering his aunt. SL93 (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - There does seem to be a fair amount of information for this article and according to this the article has been viewed about 500 times in the last 3 months alone. I hesitate in saying falt out delete it with a moderate view count like this with infomration available. --Kumioko (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Textbook not a newspaper stuff. Routine amount of coverage for somebody who killed someone, which doesn't automatically entitle one to a Wikipedia article. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nwlaw63. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep - though i agree that this isnt any special case it seems to me that there is enough notability to justify inclusion.--BabbaQ (talk) 05:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.