Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sepulveda Jr.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert Sepulveda Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources to establish notability of an individual. Zero google news/books hits found for the full name, and web hits show images, youtube videos, and model/"socialite" websites, which don't mean much for notability.
Admittedly I gutted the article of most of the claims to notability, but they were claims that the father is minorly notable in a very minor little Florida town, as well as some sort of weird claim about feudal Notability through a vice vicar in Puerto Rico in the 1500s- in any case, notability is not inherited anyhow. tedder (talk) 03:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tedder, are you not simply jealous of the man's smoldering looks? Drmies (talk) 03:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but still. And how dare you, sir! tedder (talk) 04:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: not notable given the absence of evidence. Drmies (talk) 04:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of notability. Johnbod (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.