Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Raack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Raack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article has been given serious wiki review, as it has a section that says "including the Ohio Watercolor Society, xxx, and yyy." So I looked closer and realized that there wasn't much there in the way of WP:RS to establish WP:Artist. There are a number of watercolor competitions, which I don't think cut it. And some regional shows. I note that the McDonough Museum of Art ref that is used throughout, is from the school where he teaches/taught. He had a *faculty* show there. Theredproject (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Xxx and yyy are important awards! Voting delete since he doesn't pass any of the four prongs of WP:ARTIST. I've found a few things, but even in this article, one of the first that came up that actually mentioned him in my search, he's mentioned almost trivially: [1] SportingFlyer talk 04:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.