Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Cord Records
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Red Cord Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is nothing to indicate that this record company has any notability. No reliable sources are provided or were found upon a search; social media and trivial interviews. Doesn't meet WP:CORP or any other relevant standard. Ubelowme U Me 22:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've realized why the name of this company sounded so familiar; apparently I was prophetic in July of this year. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Righteous Vendetta. I don't specifically suggest that there is sockpuppetry going on here, but the creator of the Righteous Vendetta article and the differently-named creator of Red Cord Records appear to have strikingly similar sets of interests. Ubelowme U Me 22:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- - lol Ubelowme...I'm not the same person as the individual who created this page. I think this page should be deleted if Righteous Vendetta's page was deleted, especially because in the discussion it seemed like Righteous Vendetta was deleted in part because it's record label didn't meet specific criteria. Regardless though there needs to be more sources. Mikmania (talk) 19:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —cyberpower ChatOnline 16:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this label; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Gongshow Talk 07:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Same as Gongshow, sadly. — ΛΧΣ21™ 16:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.