Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reba Monica John (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reba Monica John

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No solid source. According to WP:BLP and WP:NMODEL, this person is not notable. All primary sources talk about her role in a film, where she played a role of having 3-5 min.s within her debut movie. The article fails WP:NACTOR. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources include in-depth and in-depth here and in-depth here and in-depth here and she's a hot new star which partially explains why her pageviews average 350+ per day (which usually correlates with notability). Meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the above is still not actually convincing for establishing her own independent notability especially when she's only had 1 film, thus there's no convincing substance. SwisterTwister talk 17:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.