Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Brown (Magician/Illusionist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 08:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Brown (Magician/Illusionist)

Notability not established. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party references. Appears to be a local personality at best. Appears to be autobiographical.Rtphokie (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above. Even if the claimed media mentions are legit, it's all local stuff. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; pretty clear-cut case of a vanity page ("living the dream"...) for subject without notability. I've notified the author of this AfD; nominator, please do that yourself when you nominate articles. Drmies (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An award from an The Society of American Magicians would obviously be notable, but I'm having trouble verifying it. I'll see if I can get someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject Magic to dig up a source to back it up. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find this award either. (The Young Magician link at http://www.magicsam.com/press/index2.html doesn't work for me. Stage magic is a notoriously hard area to get success in. Someone still at high school is unlikely to be sufficiently notable - and independent sources for notability seem to be lacking. While I wish Ray all luck, I feel the time is not yet for this article. Peridon (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I also wish Ray all the success in the world and hope he'll find the fame he's working towards that will make notability a no brainer. I've tried improving the article myself, wikifying the references, cleaning up the prose, etc. but without significant 3rd party coverage this article still isn't up to WP:N standards.--Rtphokie (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nonnotable biography as it doesn't have the coverage required by WP:N. Themfromspace (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per themfromspace. Antics don't help. -- samj _in ^out 15:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please make it vanish, or I suppose, delete. I can't find anything that makes me believe that this is more than a local reasonably talented kid. I suppose it isn't speedyable? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Not yet sufficiently notable. Give him a few years and then maybe. Thelongview (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. 129.88.65.39 (talk) 15:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.