Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratu Bagus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ratu Bagus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable religious leader. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- However the topic has appeared in two newspapers as articles, so passes the GNG. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Where are these reliable sources? How do they state that the subject is notable? And, is it the same person (as this is a name for more than one person)? Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The subject remains not notable. There are no reliable sources that attribute notability to the subject. As such, the article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.