Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainchildren
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rainchildren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet notability guideline per WP:MUSIC Killian441 (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 18:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some local coverage (like this), but not much else outside of routine listings of their events. Recommending to delete per lack of significant coverage and failure to meet the notability guidelines for bands. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Looks to me as though this fails WP:GNG. Having a "local" fan base isn't usually a good sign; at the bare minimum, regional coverage is really what's needed to establish notability. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 03:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Bondegezou (talk) 14:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable, should be deleted. Koala15 (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.