Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railway Resource Centre (Australia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to New South Wales Rail Transport Museum. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Resource Centre (Australia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entity of the Australian Railway Historical Society appears to fail stand alone Wikipedia notability guidelines. I did add a mention of it to the society page. I figure it can be redirected perhaps, if the community decides it should be deleted. Thanks! SarahStierch (talk) 04:36, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into New South Wales Rail Transport Museum. The museum is notable, but it's very unlikely that its library (which appears to be the subject of this article) is independently notable. Nick-D (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the Museum as per Nick-D, that's where the content belongs. StarM 16:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - seems sensible under the circumstances. Stalwart111 12:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.