Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raelani Lucas
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as violating WP:BLP in many ways. Possible hoax. It can be "read" as an attack bio. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Raelani Lucas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Seems to be nonnotable by herself, not sure if dating a notable person make one notable as well. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 05:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as possible hoax; name and alternate spelling turn up a whopping zero hits on Google. And no, dating a notable person doesn't make one notable as well. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Toddst1 (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - nn. Article as is fails WP:BIO Sting_au Talk 05:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per Sting_au. JuJube (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete NN and possible WP:HOAX Mayalld (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Should probably be speedied per WP:BLP. --Tony Sidaway 09:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.