Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Ter Horst (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Ter Horst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable glamour model, failing WP:ENT, the GNG, and all potentially relevant SNGs. Non-Playmate caught up in the recent mass Playmate AFDs, where the article was kept for procedural reasonas despite have multiple substantive delete !votes and no substantive !keep votes. No significant coverage; only three trivial GNews hits, all GBooks hits are compilations of Wikipedia articles. Playboy cover count, cited in earlier AFD, may appear impressive, but all are in licensed-out non-US editions, far less noteworthy, and includes group shots, tiny inset photos, etc; the total for Drew Barrymore is 16, for Jenny McCarthy 36, for Pamela Anderson 169 (not a typo), . . . and for Marge Simpson, 11. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.