Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RRE Ventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RRE Ventures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NOT DIRECTORY. Complete absence of encyclopedic information. or substantial third party sources DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Puff piece, not a valid Wikipedia entry supported by neutral sources.TH1980 (talk) 03:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I suspect that the author user:Jdriv is James D. Robinson IV, who has a clear COI. Let an unbiased observer write this article. I rewrote James D. Robinson IV (also the target of an AfD). I think it's OK now. Rhadow (talk) 11:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- user:Jdriv was on this afternoon tinkering with James D. Robinson IV. I left him a message at talk:James D. Robinson IV. I have no time or interest to work on this article RRE Ventures Rhadow (talk) 20:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The first source is the company site and is not independent, the second includes only a mention and the third does not provide enough coverage either. There is not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG and it fails WP:CORP. Additionally in its current version the article violates WP:NOTCATALOG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.