Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prussian Blue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A once barely notable and now completely forgotten group about whom no reliable information can be found for more than half a decade. Not to mention the possible WP:BLP violation. It would be impossible to enumerate how many more notable figures do not have a page here but if we just stay within the same general territory, why is Andrew Anglin, who has gotten far more contemporary media attention, simply a redirect if we have this? I would also delete Dark Walker which is even less notable. Arcaesia (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is the third nomination, not second. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (American duo) ("overwhelming keep") and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prussian Blue (4th nomination) ("speedy keep"). Station1 (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. "...about whom no reliable information can be found..." is not accurate. Links lead to articles at ABC News, the NY Daily News, the Telegraph, the ADL and the SPLC, among others. We may not like them, but they're notable. Station1 (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. This article has problems, but reliable coverage exists in enough depth to indicate notability. If there are BLP violations, please explain them, either here, on the article's talk page, or at WP:BLPN. Grayfell (talk) 09:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to meet RS/GNG. Not sure on BLP alleged violation. Everything looks okay. South Nashua (talk) 19:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: enough RS already in the article to justify its keeping, and the fact they have featured in TV documentaries and a book should provide further references. Unless the nominator has changed their name or opened a new Wikipedia account, I'm puzzled as to why their only action on Wikipedia to date has been to nominate this article for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 00:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I support re-naming this page so Prussian Blue redirects to Prussian blue, but there's no case to delete it. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was also surprised that the article about the pigment wasn't already the primary article, but best wait until the result of this AfD before proposing page renaming. Richard3120 (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: They put out 2 albums, were known well in the news, drew the serious notice of the SPLC, & made more news with their conversion. They're a cobblestone on the White Nationalist road, to use a metaphor. Very worthy of inclusion... Veryproicelandic (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.