Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prajapati clans
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Prajapati clans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page gives totally fake information and has no source/reference. It seems that it's simply individual's own opinion which he used just for the sake of glorifying a caste Mahensingha 18:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Kumhar. And I wish Sitush would come back. --NeilN talk to me 18:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Totally unsourced and almost certainly unsourceable OR. Nothing worth saving or merging. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Fully unsourced and portrays individual opinion only.Mahensingha 06:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahensingha (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.