Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Jain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. decltype (talk) 09:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Jain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable YouTube singer/personality. Sources include tabloid-like coverage and are not suitable for notability. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Previously deleted thee times under the name "Dhinchak Pooja". Razer(talk) 06:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Amongst sources used in the article are stories from Times of India, Indian Express, Daily News and Analysis, BBC, Mid Day, The Express Tribune, india.com, NDTV, CNN-News18, Hindustan Times etc., these sources are not "tabloid-like" and thus very much suited to show notability. GNG is established many times over. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surprising article on this subject with another title was deleted. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Her Dilon Ka Shooter featured on Tommy Sandhu's programme Tommy Sandhu's Best Bits, on BBC Radio's Asian Network, in an episode titled: "Dhinchak Pooja and Nakash Aziz", he called Jain as a "hot new talent, straight out of India", and has noted that the video received 3.7 million in three days or so, it was the "Song that had everyone singing around the world... even Tommy".[1][2] Yogesh Khandke (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Clearly notable subject as indicated by coverage in plethora of reliable sources, in a time span of a year. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Yogesh Khandke (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Comment: Before I add my vote I would like to ask the author to disclose if he has any COI here. The article was deleted thrice per A7 which included almost the same contents and sources, the most recent edit regarding this topic was this request for undeletion at WP:RfU which was declined by Anachronist due to notability issues and then recreating article under different title is very suspicious. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say a user with over 14,000 edits in a wide variety of topics over 18 different Wikimedia projects spanning more than 10 years is a well-established editor who is unlikely to have a COI in this case. The deleted article whose restoration I declined in RFU was created by a different user, User:Wazzaaayush, who also requested its deletion, and it's a very different article than the one under review here. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I author declare that I have no COI, the present title is not "another name" it is the subject's own name, also I'm surprised that article was speedy deleted, subject's notability is beyond any reasonable doubt to the best of my understanding of Wikipedia. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 02:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- I created the article Dhinchak Pooja unaware of this article. Actually she is known as Dhinchak Pooja than her real name, just like others are known for their stage name or screen name. As per WP:COMMONNAME the article should be Dhinchak Pooja not Pooja Jain.Marvellous Spider-Man 16:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC, and continues to receive ongoing coverage in reliable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.