Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poncho (drinking game)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Poncho (drinking game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable drinking game, something made up one night. WuhWuzDat 20:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I was just about to prod it. Delete per nomination. De728631 (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Textbook case of Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 20:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - OR, self-created, no notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article states it was created 6 days ago, on July 2. Textbook case of WP:MADEUP. No references to demonstrate any form of notability whatsoever. It's also written in an unacceptably self-referential style, but that can be fixed with editing. —LedgendGamer 00:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:MADEUP Niteshift36 (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - To quote the article: "Poncho is a drinking game developed over several days in Ontario, Canada beginning on July 2nd 2009." If that doesn't say that it was made up one day, I don't know what does. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I am starting to consider an RfC to make Drinking Game without a reliable source in the initial article, a CSD category. Shadowjams (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.