Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pim Pom Pam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pim Pom Pam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources and therefore no assertion of notability. Oreo Priest ^talk 09:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Oreo Priest ^talk 13:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, made up at school one day. YouTube is not a reliable source. JIP | Talk 12:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Seems like yet another variant of the tongue twister drinking games (Fuzzy duck, Fizz buzz, Cardinal Puff, etc.) As a group they're notable, but not individual articles on their individual phrases. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't sound very notable, no significant coverage. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is a made up drinking game. I couldn't find any reliable sources to establish notability. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm the author of the article. I understand the source is weak at best but aren't all drinking games made up at some point? I also could not find any other sources than the ones I have given. I tried my best to look through other sources. ChaoticHavok (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might find reading WP:N, WP:RS & WP:V clarifies some of this. Wikipedia isn't about truth, it's about verifiability (I don't write this stuff, I'm just reporting it). More straightforwardly, this isn't a news service. The latest fabrications rightly don't get reported, we wait until they're covered elsewhere beforehand. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another non-notable drinking game. Joe Chill (talk) 00:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of RSes. There does appear to be an album which might be notable of the same name however. Hobit (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.