Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phase One Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phase One Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of meeting WP:NCORP. Google searches not finding any WP:significant coverage. noq (talk) 07:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I tagged this for notability and lack of references in 2016 and these remain in place. It was deleted a week ago after a Prod by another user but has now been restored on request from a new user who appears to be from the company. Regarding the weblinks that the user supplied in their Restore request on Explicit's Talk page, these are primary sites, Discogs and a Huffpost contributor Q&A with the company founder. These are far from sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find passing mentions of this firm being the rights agency for this or that work, but I am not seeing the coverage about the firm needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per AllyD's rationale. The article is a stub that is sourced almost completely by primary sources only. No third-party coverage from independent RS to indicate notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. TheRedDomitor (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.