Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pexco, LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pexco, LLC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG on lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Only cited sources are the company itself and a press release posted on thestreet.com. A Google search doesn't turn up secondary source coverage outside of industry publications, which don't cut it under WP:CORPDEPTH ("media of limited interest and circulation"). Batard0 (talk) 04:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The sources in the article are either press releases or sources affiliated with the subject. None of them qualify as a reliable source. The Google test failed, so I'm doubtful an article can be written that is based on reputable sources independent of the subject and does not promote the subject. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 02:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.