Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Johnson (television executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Johnson (television executive)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO and seems to be made by a user with a linear interest in this person. AmericanAir88^(talk) 22:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:31, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE. The fact that the text has been created by an editor with few other interests in Wikipedia beyond this article piles on the guilt. -The Gnome (talk) 08:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cleaned out the promotional language and over-citing, and what's left is a few higher-level marketing jobs at large companies sourced to press releases or lightly-edited reprints of press releases. Whoever created the article clearly had access to a lot of personal information and built the article from that. An obvious attempt at (self-)promotion, so could be deleted under policy as unambiguous WP:PROMO, but in guideline terms the subject also fails to meet WP:GNG, as coverage is either not significant nor not independent (e.g. the Hollywood Reporter "coverage" is part of a press release, and THR is his former employer). Bakazaka (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.