Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Cox (Magic: The Gathering player)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See the closing rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Black (Magic: The Gathering player). Sandstein 11:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Cox (Magic: The Gathering player)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and BLP. Article sourced entirely to the website of the Wizards of the Coast game company. LavaBaron (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails GNG and BLP. Nothing notable about this individual. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets thesubject-specific criteria here (200 Pro Points) Tazerdadog (talk) 11:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But that's not policy. That is something on WP:WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, an obscure Wikiproject with not single listed participant. A Google News search for the terms "Patrick Cox" and "Magic: The Gathering" yield absolutely nothing. Delete per nom. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

102 participants in the WikiProject are listed here. The sources are there if you dig. (e.g.) [1] (audio interview), [2] Tazerdadog (talk) 12:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is no widespread consensus to overturn GNG for more specific characters for players of this particular game.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.