Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Jorge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 01:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Jorge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

minor politician, fails WP:NPOL. also fails WP:GNG. Therea May Smith (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Deputy municipal councillor is not an office that passes WP:NPOL, but there's no evidence here of sufficient reliable source coverage about her to get her past WP:GNG in lieu.Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. At the time I posted my original comment, the article did state that she was a municipal councillor in the city of Salta, rather than a member of the legislature of Salta Province — because the nominator is the one who changed Jorge's notability claim from "member of the provincial legislature" to "deputy municipal councillor in the city" in the process of nominating it. I failed to catch that they had done that at the time, and it was reverted back to the original text after I posted my comment — but I did not misread or misrepresent what the article said at the time, the nominator (who's since been blocked) changed the article to misrepresent her actual notability claim, and it didn't get reverted back until after I commented. The topic here actually was a member of a provincial legislature, however, which is an WP:NPOL pass — some referencing improvement is definitely needed here, but we do indeed keep articles about provincial or state legislators. And Lonehexagon is also correct that the sources refer to her as Gabriela, not Patricia. Flag for refimprove, and move the article to her WP:COMMONNAME, but keep. Bearcat (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She is not a deputy municipal councilor. She is a member of the provincial legislature, which is basically equivalent to being in a state legislature in the United States, and clearly passes notability guidelines. She is "for the provincial capital", in that that is her district, she is not a member of the municipal council but the provincial legislature.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Provincial legislator. Also note that most reports refer to her as Gabriela Jorge, not Patricia. Some news found here: Salta Entre Lineas. The results reference linked in the article does pull up this which shows results in her election. --Enos733 (talk) 05:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I looked into this person and they got quite a bit of coverage as an activist and in her position. As someone else mentioned, she typically uses the name "Gabriela Jorge" (without Patricia) so that may be part of why it was difficult initially to find sourcing. Lonehexagon (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Now that the nominator's malfeasance has been revealed and I've withdrawn my isolated delete vote accordingly, I've requested that MBisanz come back and just close this as a WP:SNOW keep instead of leaving it open for another week. There's no chance whatsoever that it's going anywhere, so there's no point in leaving it open anymore. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:POLITICIAN a provincial legislator.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.