Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over-arcing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Over-arcing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG WP:NOTDIRECTORY WP:NOTTEXTBOOK StringRay (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It would be better for the nominator to state the reason for deletion in English. In particular I can't see any relevance for WP:NOT PAPER here. Having got that off my chest this is clearly not a notable topic. I can't find any reliable sources that use this term in this manner, rather than contain an accidental juxtaposition of the words "over" and "arcing", apart from the patent linked in the article which is a primary source. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry, just a gnome and have never nominated something for deletion before and wasn't sure what to write. (Have removed WP:NOT PAPER.) You expressed precisely my thoughts, though. I stumbled upon the entry because I was Googling the difference between "overarcing" and "overarching". The latter is correct usage. The former is a non-word except for this specific engineering thing, which is definitely not notable. StringRay (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 01:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.