Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordered from the Catalogue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mark Rae. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ordered from the Catalogue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 08:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 09:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 09:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete per nom~~ - nice album (I'm playing it now), but I'm having trouble finding even unreliable sources about it - David Gerard (talk) 10:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Mark Rae is probably best - David Gerard (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: well, there's a review on AllMusic and another one in Muzik magazine (page 74), so there are at least two RS reviews of the album, and I would be willing to bet that there are more reviews to be found in the print versions of other UK dance magazines at the time, such as Mixmag, DJ Mag, Ministry and Jockey Slut. Whether these reviews are enough to keep the article, given that you can probably find two or more reviews for any other dance mix/compilation released over the last twenty-five years despite the fact that virtually none of them have ever charted, I don't know. Richard3120 (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, they're short reviews saying "nice compilation", which it is, but nothing that seems significant to me. Maybe I'm asking too much ... - David Gerard (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I am guarded in my "keep" vote, because there must be literally hundreds, if not thousands, of mix compilations that would meet point 1 of WP:NALBUM and therefore "pass" notability... but I don't necessarily consider them all to be worthy of a Wikipedia article. Richard3120 (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mark Rae as a compromise solution. The album does not appear to be independently notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.