Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notability (2nd nomination)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to meta. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply isn't notable enough. Fryedk (talk) 05:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability is non notable -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pi. Stifle (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.