Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Writing Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Kim Stafford. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest Writing Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and nonnotable. Small part of a graduate school in a relatively small college. No third party indication of significance; No evidence that its worth merging, or even a redirect. Mostly written by eds. with admitted coi -- se the article history. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kim Stafford, the founder of the Institute. The target already mentions it and already has a link to the institute in its External Links section. It's the same link as the sole link included in the instant article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kim Stafford as above. Sources mainly point to Stafford as a founder of the organization, and nothing about it being independent from his guidance to meet the WP:ORGCRIT. [1] [2] [3] [4] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

that Redirect is OK with me--I didn't think of the particular possibility that is being suggested. DGG ( talk ) 15:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kim Stafford - I agree this is the most logical solution. -- Dane ^talk 01:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.