Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Alahverdian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per G4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian. Created by a sock. Rs chen 7754 19:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Alahverdian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be one man's attempt to publicize his lawsuit against the government. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is properly cited with references from The Boston Globe, the Associated Press, The Providence Journal, an NBC affiliate, a CBS affiliate, and multiple other reliable, unbiased sources. Last time I checked, I'm not Alahverdian. There are multiple news stories and references. Frontpage1 (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also see: here. Frontpage1 (talk) 16:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also see this listing of LexisNexis Articles related to Alahverdian. Frontpage1 (talk) 17:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The subject was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian on August 17. I can't see the deleted article to determine if CSD G4 applies. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.