Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Tory Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Tory Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short-lived political party that didn't make any waves or receive lasting attention. Neither "New Tory Party" nor "Karol Siroky" turn up anything relevant on Google. The single reference in the article only confirms Siroky's date and place of death, and contains nothing about his foray into politics— the article is effectively unsourced, and moreover, was seemingly written by the subject himself. The only thing that might be noteworthy here (and I don't think it is) is Siroky's attempt to invalidate the 1985 Ontario general election— but that seems like it could be covered on that page, if deemed relevant. — Kawnhr (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. — Kawnhr (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not find any support to meet WP:GNG for a "New Tory Party" in Canada in the 1980's, but I did find some that suggest the one from the 1700's in England might meet it. No Objections to recreation for the subject of the 1700"s if valid references are supplied. Jeepday (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.