Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nestor Filotti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nestor Filotti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The claim for notability for these two fellows seems to be that they owned some land and a big farmhouse, and had lots of children, a handful of whom (or of whose descendants) went on to become notable in their own right. I'm afraid I don't find that very convincing. For Filotti, the only source presented is an obscure book by a descendant which hardly even mentions him - check for yourself. For Taşcă, we have as the main source a lecture delivered, as well, by a descendant. The sort of ample coverage in independent sources we might expect is completely lacking. - Biruitorul Talk 17:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page:
- Delete both, per nominator. The only claims of notability appear to be relationships to other notable people (contrary to WP:NOTINHERITED) and being "considered" patriarchs of non-notable families (one family article deleted at AfD; the other looking likely to head the same way) - again contrary to WP:NOTINHERITED. These are part of a set of articles which have been created about several linked families which do seem to contain one or two notable individuals but that notability does not extend to everyone else. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both This is part of the Filotti-Taşcă clutter that has been catching a free ride on wikipedia for a scandalously long time. See related discussions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taşcă family, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filotti family, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ligia Filotti, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Filotti and so on. Dahn (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.