Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelly Karim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 03:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Karim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:A7 declined. Does not appear notable per WP:NACTOR. While Karim has a significant role in 678, nothing else seems significant (or notable in its own right). In checking for other indicators of notability, "Nelly Karim" -wikipedia reveals 203 ghits, while "نيللي كريم‎" -wikipedia reveals only 193 ghits. This is a fair indicator of non-notability. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:55, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete The requirements are two leading roles in notable films, in only one of the two notable films she has been in can she be said to have had a leading role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Well... technically the roles don't have to be major roles. The roles just have to have gained her coverage in reliable sources. A person can have a career that is entirely non-major roles, yet as long as they have received coverage for their work they would pass notability guidelines. I'm running into a language barrier, but I'm finding enough to suggest that Karim would pass notability guidelines. She's won a few awards and she's mentioned in a book about Shakespeare in modern cinema in relation to a film she was in. She's also mentioned here as someone with a particularly large fan following in Egypt. I've asked for help from the Egypt WP, as I'm fairly sure that there will be more coverage in another language. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's bound to be more coverage in other languages such as Arabic, but I think I found enough to show that she's rather well thought of in Egypt and in the Arabic speaking world as a whole. My search was limited by the language barrier, but I did find quite a few hits when I put her Arabic name in Google News Search. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is all pretty minor and nonspecific. The fact is she's had one major role in a possibly notable film. If there's a language barrier the onus is on those calling for keep to surpass it and add the information to the article. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 16:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do think that notability is proven with the sourcing I did find, but I'm just saying that since most of the coverage is in Arabic that there will be far more coverage that needs to be added to the article that I couldn't find. The thing is, she's won multiple awards for different roles other than 678. One was a group award but the one with CIFF was for best actress. I think that this all shows her notability fairly clearly per WP:GNG. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.