Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Tewari (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 07:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen Tewari

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN businessperson. Was soft deleted via discussion, refunded to a zero-edit WP:SPA by me. Converted to a redirect by a page reviewer, and then restored today by another SPA. Strongly suspect WP:UPE farming. UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, India, and Uttar Pradesh. UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New to Wiki editing and being bitten.Would appreciate guidance in helping me contribute better, instead of nominating the page deletion. AABC234 (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If are new to Wikipedia editing, you must learn and adhere to the rules. There is no reason why this page shouldn't be nominated for deletion. It also does not makes sense why are you so willing to save this from getting deleted when this is clearly non notable and bogus! It is clear example of COI, paid editing or autobiography. Khorang 18:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, clearly fails WP:BLP , WP:GNG. This article reveals too much of personal information which needs clarification and sources for verification. Clearly it is a case of WP:COI and WP:SPIP. Khorang 18:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO and should be deleted in keeping with WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. Sources are press release/churnalism or passing mentions/trivial mentions that do not show notability for the subject. - Aoidh (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.