Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Texeira
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nancy Texeira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GNG Fail. I did find a couple of sources, first dealing with some of her lobbying work and second regarding an arrest. Together they do not constitute enough coverage. Even if they did, I am not sure the article would say much more than she is a political consultant who got in a bit of trouble with the law. Very run of the mill. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete agree with the nom that the available sourcing does not support a Wikipedia article. SportingFlyer T·C 02:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Paid for spam article. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 10:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG per RSs. She gets coverage for her fundraising, and lobbyist work, in addition to her arrest. arrest - detailed in Politico and for the dismissal of charges in the Bradenton Herald. Additionally I find many articles about her fundraising for political candidates like this mention in the Tampa Bay Times and the Florida Times Union - She also wrote an editorial in the Tallahassee Democrat. She gets hired as a lobbyist as well- Orlando Sentinel.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightburst (talk • contribs)
- Lightburst, you know the standards here really well so I am not sure why you would cite these trivial mentionsas supporting her notability.
- "Since the company bought The Miami Herald building last spring, it's hired a dozen lobbyists, including uber-fundraiser Brian Ballard; ex-education commissioner Jim Horne; ex-congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart; and Democratic lobbyists Sean Pitts and Nancy Texeira." (Orlando Sentinel)
- Authoring an editorial (Tallahassee Democrat) is not a supporting item either.
- The Tampa bay times says only "Galvano and other senators raised an extraordinary $44 million, with a giant assist from and tireless fundraiser Nancy Texeira of St. Petersburg."
- The dismissal of charges source is good, as is the Florida Times Union source. The others are trivial coverage. In total, we do not have enough for GNG. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- Lightburst, you know the standards here really well so I am not sure why you would cite these trivial mentionsas supporting her notability.
- Delete Fails NPOL and GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Folks, really, there's so little coverage of her, especially considering her attempts at getting publicity. Many people have written op-eds, including me, and that does not lend itself to notability (although if she was otherwise notable, it would be worth a line in the external links). If I were her, and I read this AfD, I would fire her publicity agency. Not that she did that of course - it would be so gauche. Bearian (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. She's name dropped in media coverage, but there is nothing specifically about her as the main subject. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 18:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.