Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Alexander-Dhean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Alexander-Dhean

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced BLP. I dream of horses (T) @ 08:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per TOOSOON - I'm also getting the feeling judging by the image this was an attempt to promote, Anyway according to IMDb they've only been in one film and even that's not out till gone 2016, So will have to say delete. –Davey2010^Talk 22:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I concur with the others. This reads like an autobiography, and the only source is the IMDb, which is not a reliable source. I don't see any coverage in reliable sources. It does seem to be too soon for an article as of yet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely non-notable with no significant sources to support. SwisterTwister talk 18:39, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.