Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MythWurks Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MythWurks Corporation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of several promotional articles added by a user with a suspected COI. While the article looks expansive at first glance, a search through the article shows that there are serious tone issues with the article as well as issues with reliable sources. A search for the corporation does not bring up any coverage in reliable sources for any of the names of the company, with the coverage I'm finding being almost solely press releases and non-reliable sources. A look at the sources on the article shows that none of them could be considered reliable sources that show notability. I'd speedy this except that it's just on the edge to where someone could claim that it isn't overly promotionally written, so I'm submitting it for AfD. I'm also nominating The World of Myth Magazine for the same issues, as it has no claim to notability. I was going to try to speedy it under A7, but I'm not sure it fits cleanly under the web notability speedy. It's an online magazine but isn't exactly a website. This magazine has the same issues of notability and lack of reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2012 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the reasons stated above:[reply]

Comment: This AfD is related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry D. Scheerer, also added by the same user.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. No evidence of third-party coverage. JoshuSasori (talk) 11:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of meeting WP:NCORP (corporation), WP:NMEDIA (magazine), or WP:GNG (both). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both, can't see the notability either. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.