Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music 3000

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Music 3000

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage for a full article. Perhaps there could be an article on the whole "Music" series of games, but even then, it would need more information than what this article currently includes. Zerbu ^Talk 03:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Zerbu ^Talk 03:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Coverage on article meets GNG. Waxworker (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep: Being a stub isn't a good enough reason to delete something clearly notable. Why? I Ask (talk) 09:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I agree with both of you. There's no need for an "Article for Deletion" template.
Angeldeb82 (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there are enough sources in the review section. Only the score is verified, but the actual reviews could be easily summarized to meet the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are six reviews, such as articles from IGN, Game Informer, Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine, and PlayStation: The Official Magazine to name a few. Those articles are reliable, independent and constitute of significant coverage, therefore passing WP:GNG. Perhaps there could be an article on the whole "Music" series of games...- IMO this game is individually notable and this article falls under WP:NOMERGE. VickKiang (talk) 06:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.