Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munyaradzi Gwisai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 13:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Munyaradzi Gwisai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced WP:BLP found via WP:URBLP. While the person is notable and the information may well be correct, I can't (with a reasonable amount of effort) find reliable sources for it. There are several Google News hits to Zimbabwean media, but since the press in Zimbabwe is generally state-controlled (see Zimbabwe#Media), I do not think that any of them qualify as reliable sources for the biography of a Zimbabwean opposition politician. Unless somebody with better access to reliable sources about African politics can source the article, it should be deleted per WP:V. Sandstein 13:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seem to be enough mentions in the international press to verify the information in the article. See, e.g., [1], [2]. Ray^Talk 16:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the many reliable sources found by the Google News and Books sources spoon-fed in the nomination. I would expect a lawyer and wannabe arbitrator to at least spend a few seconds looking at such readily available evidence before claiming to have made a "reasonable amount of effort". Phil Bridger (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Phil Bridger. Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.