Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muntakhab Ahadith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muntakhab Ahadith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK, doesn't meet WP:BOOKCRIT. I did google search but found nothing other than amazon & other book selling site. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I looked in Urdu and didn’t see any RIS discussing this book, just offerings of various other selected hadiths. Mccapra (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the link of amazon dot com. (English version). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owais Bin Elias (talk • contribs) 12:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here are refeences: Janson, Marloes (2014). Islam, Youth and Modernity in the Gambia: The Tablighi Jama'at. Cambridge University Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-1-107-04057-1. Retrieved 12 July 2020.Religion on the Move!: New Dynamics of Religious Expansion in a Globalizing World. BRILL. 2012. p. 174. ISBN 978-90-04-24337-8. Retrieved 12 July 2020.43.245.120.78 (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mere name mention in Google books doesn't shows the notablity, and refering E-commerce website like this [1] in the article won't help it in passing notablity criteria. Fails wp:sigcov. Dtt1^Talk 16:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In the light of the two sources identified above I still think deletion is appropriate but now also think we should redirect to Tablighi Jamaat. Mccapra (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.