Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muna Abigail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muna Abigail

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is questionable notability because the references are from press release sites/directories and I can't find any reliable sources. The references were posted only a few days ago. There also seems to be a conflict of interest since the article creator posted one of the references in the article [1]. Finally, the top google hits seem to be astroturfing of social networking sites with questions like 'who's heard of Muna abigail?' and digg/tweet links for the press releases. Clubmarx (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. —Clubmarx (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNo hits at Google News Archive or Google Books, and no reliable and independent sources included in the article.Fails WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Clubmarx (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Puff piece that lacks proper referencing. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 01:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.