Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Jackson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Jackson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A run of the mill state beauty contest winner. That alone does not make one notable, and there is nothing else making her notable. The sources are all the run of the mill sources we see on such beauty queens. The previous nomination was on a totally different person who is some sort of muscian. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I think there is enough coverage to keep the article.Trillfendi (talk) 05:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Run-of-the-mill beauty contestant who placed well outside the winner's circle in the one national pageant she competed in. Fails WP:NMODEL. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete fails WP:NMODEL, but clearly has significant coverage --DannyS712 (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NMODEL and coverage isn't enough to show she is notable enough for an entry under WP:GNG guidelines. JC7V (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on account of subject failing WP:NMODEL. -The Gnome (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.