Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mono (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mono (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable game Sven Manguard Wha? 07:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Couldn't find sources. Ansh6 6 6 08:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it is not notable.Frmorrison (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Only has one link, fails WP:NOTABILITY, and is poorly written to boot. Konveyor Belt ^{yell at me} 04:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This doesn't fit the criteria for a speedy delete, unless you really mean "snow close as delete". DES ^(talk) 19:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, no sources of significance found. (If additional significant sources are posted here or to the article after this comment, the closer should discount this comment.) It appears this was originally a test, and it never seems to have taken of enough to gain notability. DES ^(talk) 19:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.