Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monero Talk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monero Talk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable youtube/podcast thing. Nothing found for sourcing beyond where I can stream it. Very PROMO and sourcing is all primary. And crypto related. Oaktree b (talk) 20:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 20:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Non-notable crypto Libertarian podcast, primary sources. I'm not too sure the host, Douglas Tuman, meets GNG either. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. The author, @Aesuithiel apparently regularly creates articles about non-notable subjects which are promptly deleted after the move to main space. Douglas Tuman appears to fall into the same category as well. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated that article as well. Oaktree b (talk) 22:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Was declined by AfC, no improvements here does not meet GNG —siro χ o 21:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Non-notable crypto-podcast. Can't find any real RS on it. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 00:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, podcasts are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, but the article is based entirely on primary sources that are not support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of GNG-building coverage shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing enough RS referencing to establish notability for the podcast or Tuman. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete crypto stuff. Declined twice to AfC for not being notable, and then was copied and pasted(?) here. SWinxy (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of sufficient coverage in independent sources, just like the page about Douglas Tuman. Suitskvarts (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.