Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Spencer Bown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Spencer Bown

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person who has garnered a couple of articles of human interest media coverage — but as all he did to garner that is travel a bit, none of it rises to the level necessary to make him notable enough to be permanently enshrined in an encyclopedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Pburka (talk) 15:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There's a lot of coverage in newspapers when reviewing the search results in Google news. If that were all that happened, I'd agree it would be a one event item of news coverage. However, we see that coverage persists as he is covered again in 2013. -- Whpq (talk) 17:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He traveled more than "a bit", he meets the GNG as I found worldwide coverage, and I don't know where the "permanently enshrined" comment comes from. A Wikipedia article simply means that a topic is notable. A Wikipedia article is not a shrine. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.