Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Chadwick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Chadwick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Two of the three references are based on interviews. Also created to promote the subject by a COI editor. MT Train^Talk 15:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems like he should be notable but I couldn't find anything. Are some of the assertions hoaxes? FloridaArmy (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 3 refs in the article none of which indicate notability. 11 edits in total since the article was created 3 years ago, I can't see many edits ever being added, COI tag because the article author works for his company. Szzuk (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.