Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Collison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Collison

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NMODEL Article is poorly sourced to verify claims made in it so I tried to look for some. In my before, I couldn’t find any significant coverage. Or at least not enough for an article. I found only one interview in Interview of all places. Trillfendi (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as subject meets WP:GNG with international RS coverage over many years. Some examples: Ash, Amanda (19 July 2013). "Local models make Italian Vogue; Coveted covers for Dorian Reeves, Meghan Collison". Edmonton Journal. p. G.3. — Traill-Nash, Glynis (16 December 2007). "Collison right on Cue for campaign style". The Sun-Herald. p. 26. — Akhtar, Amina (2008). "Everybody's Favorite Face". New York (Spring Supplement). pp. 148, 150–151. — Fernández Abad, Ana; Rinciari, Francesca (14 February 2015). "Meghan Collison: "Comprendo la nostalgia por las décadas pasadas. No puedo culpar a los diseñadores por mirar atrás"". El Pais (in Spanish). Bakazaka (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.