Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mason Robinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this individual meets WP:GNG or WP:NGRIDIRON. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 20:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep after a quick search, I found enough coverage to make me think he is notable. AutomaticStrikeout ? 01:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A Google news search of +"Mason Robinson" +rutgers returned a large number of articles, more than enough to pass WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul McDonald. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON nor WP:GNG. Coverage of him seems like routine sports reporting (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER). Jakejr (talk) 01:12, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment feature articles in New York Times and ESPN far surpass routine reporting. See essay WP:NOTROUTINE for clarification.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.