Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Rogers (professor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 10:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Rogers (professor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC - only an adjunct professor. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NACADEMIC#1 with thousands of citations to her work according to Google Scholar search. Though nom does not bring up WP:AUTHOR, subject probably passes that as well, given well-known books with multiple reviews. Bakazaka (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but... The citation counts in Google Scholar for "Enterprise one-to-one", "Is your company ready", "Do you want to keep your customers", and "Managing customer experience" (two of them over 1000, the other two close) convince me that she does pass WP:PROF#C1 and probably WP:AUTHOR. But as you might guess from the spammy titles, the article is heavily promotional and needs effort to be brought in line with Wikipedia standards. In its current state, it is a plausible candidate for G11 speedy deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, David Eppstein. I have done a little editing, moving it towards a more WP:NPOV. Compared to much of what I nominate for G11 speedy deletion, this one was not so bad! Edwardx (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:PROF. James500 (talk) 03:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meet PROF and likely AUTHOR. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:ANYBIO in the field of customer management ie. (apologies for the apparent hype:))"The names Don Peppers and Martha Rogers PhD are synonymous with the idea of dealing with customers one‐to‐one. ... They are now considered leading authorities on customer‐focused strategies for business." (from Conversations With Marketing Masters), "One-on-one with One-on-one's Martha Rogers" from Wired, and WP:NAUTHOR (again from Conversations With Marketing Masters - "Together they have co‐authored a series of international best sellers which have collectively sold well over a million copies in seventeen languages.", plus here are examples of reviews of her books: from Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship - review of Enterprise One to One, and from Publishers Weekly - a review of One to One B2B. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.